Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : APMP (formerly APM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AlienTech who wrote (10629)	4/12/1998 1:24:00 AM
From: WTMHouston	Respond to of 13456

That's why I called them interesting facts instead of meaningful or informative facts.... I wish I could keep this pace up on a permenant basis....a down cycle will come, as it always does....save the commissions....:) Troy

To: AlienTech who wrote (10629)	4/12/1998 1:35:00 AM
From: WTMHouston	Respond to of 13456

Here are the point changes and the explanations....As best I can tell, this completely reconciles the daily and weekly recaps with the monthly recaps and the current numbers on both appear to be accurate. As always, if I have screwed something up, let me know. It is time for me to go play the floppy eared rabbit and hide some eggs....now that I have finished laying them. Troy Virgil -2 In week 9, the standings showed 10 + -1 = 9 when it should have been 8 + -1 = 7 Jermoney -1 In week 9, the standings showed 5 + 0 = 5 when it should have been 4 + 0 = 4 Alex -2 In week 10, the standings showed -1 + 0 = -1 when it should have been -4 + 0 = -4 For some reason Alex also showed up twice on the list, once at -1 and once at -4 Techinvest -1 In week 9, the standings showed -1 + 5 = 4 when it should have been -2 + 5 = 3 Gary +1 In week 10, the standings showed 5 + 0 = 5 when it should have been 6 + 0 = 6 Steve Lee +1 In week 9, the standings showed -1 + 0 = -1 when it should have been 0 + 0 = 0 Lou -2 In week 9, the standings showed -1 + -1 = -2 when it should have been -3 + -1 = -4