Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Clarke who wrote (9860)	4/12/1998 6:30:00 PM
From: KipferlMeister	Respond to of 116762

One possible message is that Hillary is no ditzoid. I doubt a Fed chairman would have had much to chat about with, say ...Nancy Reagan (nor her husband for that matter). -Michael

To: Jack Clarke who wrote (9860)	4/12/1998 6:58:00 PM
From: Isaac Silverstein	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116762

That was a signal to the bond market that interest rates would remain constant, or drop.

To: Jack Clarke who wrote (9860)	4/12/1998 8:12:00 PM
From: MtnBear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116762

My own thoughts have always been that Hillary has been and will remain the brains of the Billary combo (that is unless Bill starts to be history before the end of his term - in which case we will start to see signs of her distancing herself). A. G. up there next to "the brains" sent the message that nothing would be done to derail the Clinton Presidency if the Fed could help it. A. G. has apparently committed to letting the good times roll, at least until he himself decides to cut and run or retire. The price of power is high, he paid it, and for whatever reason seems determined to stick it out. Who knows, maybe H. has something on A. G. or even the other way around. My thoughts; Mtn Bear

To: Jack Clarke who wrote (9860)	4/12/1998 8:55:00 PM
From: Terry Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116762

Jack, Glad to have you stop by for a visit. I missed both of Clinton's inaugurations, I have a low pain threshold. I agree with MtnBear's last post, either Clinton or somebody very powerful may have access to a skeleton in Mr. Greenspan's closet. This person or these people would then have him in their hip pocket. A newsletter that I receive has described a quid pro quo agreement between Greenspan and Clinton made early in Clinton's first term when Greenspan's re-appointment came due. Supposedly Greenspan agreed to a loose monetary policy if he was re-appointed. Terry,