SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The Panda Project (PNDA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JAGUAR who wrote (1202)4/12/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1521
 
A little touchy that people think that the infomercial was a joke? Heck, I think it'll move some units to the less informed members of the community. You've got to admit the placement wasn't exactly the best, I mean, the TV wouldn't have been on, or tuned that channel if it were, in my house if I didn't have an interest in the stock. 12:30 on Easter Sunday? That's not exactly prime time. I guess those infomercials must make money, I keep running into some that I stumbled past years ago. The fact that they're still buying time tells me they're selling whatever it is they're selling. I think repetitiveness is the key though, unless the Project is planning on doing those regularly, it really was a waste of money.

BTW JAGUAR, are you admitting an affiliation with the Project by your statement >>>Gee mike F that's slander, good job, be awaiting some paperwork delivered to you, you'll hear from me soon.<<<? I think you need a little thicker skin if your going to be a public figure, if you're not just a SC wannabe.

BTW, I would countersue for malicious prosecution, if anyone were to try to sue me for posting my opinions on an opinion thread. But that's me, I'm a vindictive woman.

Barb



To: JAGUAR who wrote (1202)4/12/1998 9:58:00 PM
From: Jumper  Respond to of 1521
 
Then you are S.C., the notorious idiot?



To: JAGUAR who wrote (1202)4/13/1998 1:32:00 AM
From: Mike Farmwald  Respond to of 1521
 
JAGUAR: I'm confused, I don't think I mentioned the name
"JAGUAR" in my post, only "Melissa Crane". Are you saying
you're actually Melissa?

If so, you should pick a single online name and stick to it.
People who change their name every few months make me suspicious
they have something to hide.

Mike



To: JAGUAR who wrote (1202)4/13/1998 1:36:00 AM
From: chester lee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1521
 
Jaguar,

Slander? What are you talking about. Are you implying you are affiliated with PNDA? If you are in anyway related to PNDA or it's corporate officers, then you should be worried about the SEC breathing down your neck. Following the SEC, may be a class action lawsuit on behalf of PNDA shareholders who lost money trading PNDA on your hype. I'm sure anyone filing a lawsuit will subpoena to SI to turn over the email addresses of Paulie, MEL64, the Man, Joey (aka Batman and Robin), and anybody else who has hyped PNDA.

Chester



To: JAGUAR who wrote (1202)4/13/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: Mike Farmwald  Respond to of 1521
 
JAGUAR,

You know that our court system frowns on legal filings under
an assumed name, I hope. Under what name should I expect
to be served? Stanford, Melissa, MEL65, JAGUAR, Paul Jackson, ...?

Mike