Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : BET YOUR ASSAY - Mining Terms Explained -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gabe Heti who wrote (393)	4/13/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 463

Gabe, This is a geophysicists' opinion so "Caveat Emptor" I would like to see the geophysics, but my opinion of the assays presented by you and again on their website is: 1) I do not see those grades over that interval. A running average is not legitimate 2) The values presented come from discrete intervals (stockwork veining?) I assume intervening material runs zippo. 3) These values should probably be cut. 4) The assays presented include many sub-intervals and sort of confuse the viewer into seeing larger intervals than actually exist. 5) They (Anteres) describe a large database of drilling therefore I would expect to see other results before I would consider these assays that impressive 6) Some nice numbers but pretty low on the interest scale without supporting info, that should already exist given the previous work in the area. Just a cursory opinion. 1King