SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Quad Sevens who wrote (14760)4/13/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: Mr Logic  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 31646
 
Wade, what most people think of as the fundamentals - rev, earnings, market etc. are the same. Of course the article is good and I said so.

>>Second, in the stock market we're always working with an incomplete picture.
Extra information can bolster (me) or undermine (you) that picture. Efficient pricing
of an equity always involves an analysis of uncertainty.<<

I know this Wade. My belief, obviously disagreed with by most here is that the efficient market is not working, as is often the case. Neither of us will know that until we see how it all pans out. We get a big clue next month.

>>Or perhaps you can explain how "One of the most imaginative and useful
approaches" (Fortune Magazine on Plant Y2kOne software) can "be reinvented by
any half-decent consultant in a day or two according to standard project
management/problem solving principles"<<

Fortune's statement and mine are not mutually exclusive. TAVA offers a packaged short cut approach that will be attractive to a lot of sites. But the TAVA approach is not the only one.

>>PS: Hint - It looks silly to come here now telling us you covered 60% of your short
position last week. BS. Why'd ya do it? Fundamentals hadn't changed.<<

Similar reason I covered the rest of my short today. Last week I didn't like the way the stock price came back and held firm. Today, I began to feel I shorted too early, so I'm out, for a relatively meagre profit. I just edited out my response to your accusation that I am lying, it would have been offensive to sensitive readers.

The thread can return to normal now, with no dissenting voices.

Adieu.
Patrick.