SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (9691)4/13/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: Gauguin  Respond to of 71178
 
Touchy subject. eom.



To: jhild who wrote (9691)4/13/1998 5:19:00 PM
From: DScottD  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71178
 
>>Teenagers have no constitutional right to have sex -- even voluntarily and with each other, a California appeals court ruled Thursday. <<

Was there any dicta on whether they have a constitutional right to have involuntary sex with themselves?

Gee, mom. I couldn't help it.

DScottD



To: jhild who wrote (9691)4/13/1998 6:58:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71178
 
It said that precedents such as earlier court rulings that overturned a law requiring parental consent for abortions did not mean that minors were now free to behave as they liked in the sexual realm.

So it should be illegal??? They should be sent to jail? Frankly, I thought the kid made some pretty good points. Romeo and Juliet all over again...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News