Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : BET YOUR ASSAY - Mining Terms Explained -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gabe Heti who wrote (395)	4/13/1998 8:48:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 463

Gabe, Not an interp by any stretch, just an opinion of the grades posted on the website (hole 08). I never looked at the earlier releases. Perhaps they contain more information regarding the economical potential of grades vs tonnage. The resource calculation should be interesting. I will check the site more closely. 1King

To: Gabe Heti who wrote (395)	4/15/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: bill718	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 463

Gabe, I guess you realize by now that the upcoming ANZ:TSE resource est. on the BC property DOES NOT include the CREEK zone (contrary to your previous posting here). Only 8 holes so far on the Creek zone, and they will be drilling the next one in early June, then assaying the core immediately cause time is now of the essence. The Creek zone is a high priority target based on heavy mineral sampling, soil geochem, and IP surveys (and hole 8 is the best hole on the J.D. property to date). The Au soil geochem anomaly extends about 400m within a larger 700m IP anomaly, so this is going to be very interesting. Later, Wayne