Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : JAWS Technologies - NASDAQ (NM):JAWZ -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Forest Gump who wrote (160)	4/13/1998 10:23:00 PM
From: Mark[ox5]	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3086

Yes we spoke about the govt regulations and that is one reason I have to also temper my excitement here. I think I raised the same point as you did. Right now this co. is still in the cookie jar, no contracts, no sales, etc. So it will take some time.. and/or the promotion of the $5M contest to get people to recognize it. This is a good thread, I think already in less than a 150 posts we have spoken about many of the most important issues and raised many of them. (unlike some threads that shall remain NAMELESS--starts with a F, ends in an H) Good to have someone like you here who knows the tech side too. I hope Chris can answer Tom H's questions more thoroughly.. I think he raised some good points. Mark

To: Forest Gump who wrote (160)	4/14/1998 1:28:00 AM
From: Moonglow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3086

Hiya Forest!!! Hey...it's really good to see you here. I don't think I've ever "spoken" to you before, but I have certainly enjoyed your notes on DGIV and FAMH. How'd you find us over here? Say...wouldn't it be neat as time goes on if more and more of the DGIV thread finds us too? And the FAMH thread? Uh...well...uh...as much as I like everyone on there (or most everyone), I think we can wait a little bit longer for them to start finding us. <gggg> Speaking of encryption companies, you might want to take a peek at this thread.......http://www.c2.net/about/ It was given to me by a good friend. It has much information too, and might possibly be a potential competitor of Jawz. I mention it because of your mention of the U.S. laws. The laws aren't doing much of anything to stop the REST of the world from getting hold of the encryption that they want. The company profiled in that website that I've just given you is in England. And that brings up a good point that I read on this thread somewhere. I believe that I read that it is not illegal to LICENSE the technology. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. So....assuming for a moment that I'm right....then JAWZ has the potential of making beaucoup bucks just by licensing their products without having to export them. If they license it to a firm that lies outside of the U.S. or Canada, then the export laws won't apply. At least that's my understanding of the situation. Now's the time for somebody to correct me if I'm wrong or to validate me if I'm right. Juanita