SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Khris Vogel who wrote (52876)4/14/1998 2:33:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Khris - re: "Ever notice that Jim always tells us which way the wind is blowing?"

Of course.

I described him once, a week or two ago, as a reed, bending whichever way the wind is blowing.

It's intersting to read his past posts - from his early "CYRIX IS THE GREATEST" to his "Intel is the Technology Leader" to "Intel is a doggy barker" and "AMD is going to Clean Intel's Clock" to his "AMD can still survive...if they are blessed by a miracle".

Seems like all of Jim's horses have come up lame and have been shot!

Paul



To: Khris Vogel who wrote (52876)4/14/1998 2:45:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Intel Investors - First Benchmark Reports of 100 Mhz 440BX/400 MHz Pentium II devices.

Check this out. They note a 21% increase in performance, using BAPCO benchmarks, in going from a 333 MHz PEntium II (66 MHz Bus Speed) to a 400 MHz Pentium II (100 MHz Bus speed).

Note that (400-333)/333 = 67/333 = 20%.

Thus, the 20% "expected" speed improvement in going from 333 to 400 Mhz was indeed realized - since now the external bus and memory system were also speeded up by use of the 100 MHz 440BX and SDRAM memory.

Paul

{=================}

techweb.com
copyright © CMP

Proteva 400MHz Is a Screamer
By Kristen Kenedy

San Mateo, Calif. - When PCs with 350MHz and 400MHz CPUs
begin shipping later this week, retailers will have more to sell than
faster processors.

Along with the step-up in chip speed, Intel is adding a 100MHz
system bus, up from 66MHz in systems with 333MHz and slower
CPUs. That's close to a 50 percent increase in the rate data moves
among the processor, its main memory and various components.

Intel maintains that PC users will see a performance improvement
of greater than 20 percent with the new architecture. Bapco
SysMark tests used at CRW Labs reported an average increase of
about 21 percent using a 400MHz system over a similarly
configured 333MHz PC.

CPU speed and bus aren't the only determining factors of system
performance, yet a comparison of 333MHz and 400MHz systems
gives the market an early indication of overall performance
expectations. We took a look at a prototype Proteva-branded
system with an Intel Pentium II 400MHz CPU, 32MB of RAM, a
6.4GB IDE Western Digital hard drive, and an early version of an
AGP graphics card based on the Intel 740i graphics chip with 4MB
of RAM on board. We compared it to existing tests we ran on a PC
with a 333MHz CPU, 32MB of RAM, a Quantum 6.4GB hard drive
and an AGP ATI Rage Pro with 4MB of RAM on board.

We found performance benefits of the 400MHz chip were readily
apparent. Graphic-intensive applications, such as Adobe
PageMaker and CorelDraw, performed about 26 percent and 24
percent better than on a 333MHz PC, respectively.


The advantage of having a 100MHz system bus was also quickly
apparent. Information that comes from the PCI bus (where devices
such as sound cards reside), hard drives and optical drives now
travel toward the CPU and main memory at almost twice the speed.

The new processors also bring an increase in transfer speeds on
the Accelerated Graphics Port. Where many systems were running
at 1x speeds, or 66MHz, new systems with the Intel 440BX chip set
can move data to and from the AGP bus at 133MHz.

In theory, that means a leg-up for graphics-intensive applications,
such as 3-D games. Flight simulators, for example, that feature
moving clouds and varying terrains require some initial set-up
processing in the CPU and then move to the graphics card for
rendering. With a faster system and AGP bus, the data transfer
speeds should increase exponentially.

Nonetheless, we saw only a slight performance increase in our 3-D
test game, Quake II. The reason: Quake II wasn't designed for AGP,
so it doesn't take advantage of some of the performance
enhancements. The system was able to produce 19.3 frames per
second during our test, higher than average 2-D/3-D AGP cards
we've tested, but not better than the combination of separate 2-D
and 3-D PCI accelerator boards we've seen in the past. However,
we predict that games written specifically for the platform will fly on
any new 400MHz system.

For immediate gratification, users should check out soft-DVD
playback on a 400MHz system. We detected slight frame skipping
on an early 400MHz demo, but colors were vibrant and playback
was good enough for general consumption. Other consumer
applications, such as image editing, will also receive a performance
boost.

We recommend using the usual qualification process when selling
high-end systems at retail. Pitch 400MHz to customers who want
top-quality goods or who seek "future-proof" systems that can
handle applications that haven't even been introduced yet.

Methodology

CRW used Bapco's SysMark 32 benchmark to determine
performance on a number of industry-standard applications. We
also ran a frame count on a Quake demo, demo1.dm2, to look at
multimedia functionality. All tests were run three times and then
averaged for a final number.

Copyright (c) 1998 CMP Media Inc.

New Search | Search the Web





To: Khris Vogel who wrote (52876)4/14/1998 2:46:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Khris,
Hey, where is my Alaskan King Crab? <G>
Jim