SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Paramount Ventures & Finance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Diamond Daze who wrote (662)4/14/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: Yorikke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4884
 
water.usgs.gov

ppm=grms/tonne
ppb=less than that



To: Diamond Daze who wrote (662)4/16/1998 12:46:00 PM
From: Kevin C  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4884
 
I dont know how to convert but I do know how to compare and it sure looks like we have a tiger by the tail in the Pachamamita.Take a look at Paramount's announcement of January 07/98 where they announced being awarded the El Alisal. In this announcement they compared the surface samples of Bajo De La Alumbrera {International Musto } with El Alisal. Cu hi anomaly 815 ppm at Bajo De La Alumbrera..... El Alisal 820 ppm... now look at the Pachamamita.

Campa Horco min 22 ppm max.53000 ppm AVERAGE 6967 ppm.

Tapado Dyke Min 7 ppm max 13000 ppm Average 219 ppm

Topado Zone Min 15 ppm max 254 ppm Average 85 ppm

I'm no geologist but a high ppm count of 53000 or 13000 sure looks like a good starting point in comparison to 815 or 820 ppm and remember International Musto is now a producing mine.
I think we are very close to a deal with a major with numbers like this. I've been into this one pre Eureka and like most am not very pleased with management's attitude towards it's share holders when it comes to investors relations. I sure hope they get the message and smarten up on this score. In the mean time I think we have some fantastic properties and are going to succeed in spite of this short comming.

Kevin