SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (31872)4/14/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: StockMan  Respond to of 1574471
 
Spurious,
Re -- I'm sure Intel just told Compaq: "Make a Celeron box or you're low priority for PII shipments."

Wasn't it Bert the clown who claimed Intel had bribed CPQ into not using the K6.

You AMDites have buffoons written all over ya.

Stockman



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (31872)4/14/1998 10:02:00 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574471
 
Kevin, All
I would not worry about Compaq too much:
1)last year Compaq stated that Compaq have no intentions of using Media GX from Cyrx - and?
2)a bit later Compaq stated that they are not going to use k6 in their systems - and?
3)now Compaq is saying that Compaq id going to use Celeron as soon as it would be available - and what is going to happened

yes compaq will sell some celerons but at this point both Compaq and IBM got huge inventory of unsold pentiums and pIIs. IBM and Compaq is changing their strategy to adjust for falling prices by not ordering chips in advance so Compaq got no intentions of buying more than few chips to try the market. Not only Celerons are not going to replace k6s but I doubt that they would replace pmmx and low-end pIIs until the inventory is gone. By the time inventory would be gone so would be Celeron.

Regards
-Albert

ps IMHO



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (31872)4/15/1998 12:26:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574471
 
Kevin - Re: " WSJ today about Intel's antitrust violations."

Intel has never been found to have violated antitrust laws.

Why would you make such a blatantly erroneous statement?

Paul