Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CyberCash a buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Hua who wrote (971)	4/14/1998 11:35:00 PM
From: TLindt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3990

Mark, thanks for the update. Can you clarify what the 1.5 M is in reference to? As John already pointed out a few days ago, fees for overseas deals were are large part of 1997 revenues.....transactional revenues we small in comparison.....I believe 13% of last years gross.. What we have been trying to measure here today is the transactional revenues being generated.......because that number has been doubling, and needs to continue doing so on a Quarterly Basis for this ship to get off the ground. the old story about.......would you like a Million Dollars...or I'll give you a penny today...and double it every day for a month...which one do you want? Simple point I'm trying to make is transactional revenues will be huge by years end if they keep up this doubling program.

To: Tom Hua who wrote (971)	4/15/1998 12:34:00 AM
From: raefon	Respond to of 3990

As I have suggested previously on this thread, managements guidance has suggested that q-1 revenues will be SEQUENTIALLY LOWER than q-4. Management has also suggested that the revenue patterns will be quite similar to 1997. IMHO it would be a mistake to look for revenues higher than q-4. This company is doing exactly what it has suggested to the investment community it would. I am concerned that this thread has expectations that are not realistic. This business could easily be a multi billion dollar cap, just buy the stock and leave it alone. Does anyone else have a SOLID take on revenues?

To: Tom Hua who wrote (971)	4/15/1998 12:37:00 PM
From: Mark Fowler	Respond to of 3990

>>Mark, thanks for the update. Can you clarify what the 1.5 M is in reference to?<< Tom, I'm talking about revenues. H&Q estimates are at 1 mil. for 1st qtr. and 3mil. for 2 qtr. The guy at cych estimates 1.5 mil.,and told me that they're in line with estimates for this qtr. I'm happy with the stocks performance still a steel at these prices. The chart looked like it was ready to break out to the 20's very soon and here we are but sooner than I estimated. I think it's the Yhoo effect.