SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FD JR. who wrote (3533)4/14/1998 10:03:00 PM
From: Popiye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6654
 
So...what's so bad about contacting www.sec.gov and www.nasd about their thoughts regarding if all the laws have been followed and the eyes dotted..heck we are just consumers within the business of waste fraud and abuse-LOL:)



To: FD JR. who wrote (3533)4/14/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: TraderGreg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6654
 
Hey, Frank, I got this 73 Vega. Wanna buy it?

With all due respects, I said this once before, not sure what thread, but I'll repeat it:

There are more rich men in heaven, more camels that have passed through the eye of a needle, more celibate nights in Bill Clinton's life, more Turks married to Greeks, more condoms in the Vatican

THAN THERE ARE ORIGINAL INVESTORS WHO PROFIT AFTER A REVERSE SPLIT.

And a 300 for 1 at that. Yesterday, a typical investor may have had 100,000 shares at .02 = $2,000 Following a 300 for 1 reverse, that individual will have 333 shares valued at what?

And as the stock falls, which it will, it will raise the possibility of another reverse. Don't shagrin, I've seen it happen. If the next one is say just a little old 10 for 1 at .50 and no further erosion occurs after that, then that original share holder will have 33 shares at $5 = $165

That's nearly 92 % erosion in that shareholder value that ole Jack wanted to protect. If it wasn't so sad, it would be laughable. Saudis cut off hands for less.

TG