To: Ellen who wrote (45518 ) 4/15/1998 11:35:00 AM From: tonto Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 55532
Ellen, the change you notice is after much time of supported lies thrown about here by Pugs regarding me. I think some would do well to review the posts prior to the halt, the warnings expressed regarding what probably would happen, and the decision by the shareholders to risk that conclusion for the sake of a squeeze. It was high stakes gambling based on the information everyone possessed. Some decided the stakes were much too risky and sold. This discussion board provided everyone with solid information regarding the operation and assets of OVIS/RMIL. The enthusiasm behind the potential big hit everyone was here for may end up costing some too much. That is the terrible consequence which I hope will be avoided. The squeeze was started with probably bad information based upon the facts that poor diligence has been shown from day one. That in no way is meant to rub salt in the wound but instead for some to consider what really brought you to this juncture. It was Morgan, the financials, and the SEC. While you doubt my purpose, it has been to side with the investor. If more thought had been placed on the information, those unhappy with their current position would not be holding right now. Ellen, you have made some really nasty remarks on this board. Does this make you a bad person? I do not believe so, yet you imply differently about others. There is a movement to get additional information, and to validate and verify what is currently considered to be the truth by some shareholders. Squeezers consider this as a negative to their position and are threatened by it. It should not be considered so. Squeezer leadership is no better than what Gary and Roland offer. If you are going to have a chance, you need to know more facts and then make a decision. Consider this, step back, has the advice by leadership made you money? Are you happy with your current position and just waiting for the $10,000,000 to appear any day now? Do you really believe RMCW if they receive the money will want to get involved with RMIL? If so, why? Look at the facts, use the facts as a tool to your advantage. Remember, I stayed out of the personal issues until I was attacked with lies for too long. The record documented on this board shows that and then Pugs finally stepped way over the line and would not stop. Every person has a breaking point, and will return the same, and it was necessary to show the weakness in the position. The company was wrong in what it did, Gary and Roland have shown zero capacity at fiscal management, sales, truth. Yet, some follow the little guy in California who has a smaller short position than one mm for sure, and probably others have some too. That is where you should concentrate. The court actions will provide all the detail you want on Mork.