SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Stock Swap -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tech Master who wrote (13282)4/16/1998 7:15:00 AM
From: Tech Master  Respond to of 17305
 
***IRSN PRESS RELEASE***

Thursday April 16, 6:00 am Eastern Time

Company Press Release

SOURCE: Irvine Sensors Corporation

Irvine Sensors Reports Consecutive Quarterly Profit

COSTA MESA, Calif., April 16 /PRNewswire/ -- Irvine Sensors Corporation (Nasdaq: IRSN - news; BSE: ISC - news) today reported operating results for the company's second fiscal quarter and first six months ended March 29, 1998.

Revenues were $2,533,300, down from the $3,254,300 of last year's second fiscal quarter, reflecting Irvine's closure of its Vermont facility which accounted for a significant portion of the firm's revenues in fiscal 1997. This revenue trend is also reflected in the mid-year figures of $4,701,200 for the current fiscal year versus $6,929,400 in the first half of fiscal 1997. In addition to the revenue effect, the Vermont closure strongly and favorably affected Irvine's bottom line with the current second fiscal quarter realizing net income of $14,000, an over $2.7 million turnaround from the loss of $2,732,600 in last year's second fiscal period. At the mid-point of fiscal 1998, Irvine has realized net income of $197,400 versus a loss of $4,253,700 at the comparable point last year, an improvement of over $4 million.

According to John J. Stuart, Irvine Sensors' Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, ''The second quarter profit, even though it is so modest as to really be called a 'break-even', is even more significant than the larger profit of the first quarter. Unlike the first quarter, the second quarter results were achieved without the contribution of an extraordinary item, and as such, provide even stronger evidence of our operating improvements.''

James D. Evert, Irvine Sensors' President and CEO, commented, ''During the first half of the year, we have been able to achieve these improvements in operating results while still making early-stage investments in several of our emerging market technologies, such as the IMAGEK EFS-1(TM) Electronic Film System and MicroSensors' Silicon MicroRing Gyro(TM).''

Irvine Sensors Corporation (www.irvine-sensors.com), headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, is primarily engaged in the development and sale of high density electronics, micro sensors and sensor readout circuits, image processing and sensing devices, wireless infrared communications products, miniaturized electro-optical systems, and low power integrated circuits intended for diverse systems applications.

Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in this press release are forward-looking statements that are dependent on risks and uncertainties including such factors, among others, as the ability of the Company to control and further reduce its operating expenses. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Further information on the Company's status and the matters discussed herein are contained in publicly-filed disclosures available through the SEC's EDGAR data base (www.sec.gov) or the Company's Shareholder Relations.

Irvine Sensors Corporation Consolidated Statement of Operations

13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
March 29, March 30, March 29, March 30,
1998 1997 1998 1997

Revenues:
Contract research &
development $1,996,700 $650,300 $3,446,200 $3,261,400
Product sales 536,600 2,604,000 1,255,000 3,668,000
Total revenues 2,533,300 3,254,300 4,701,200 6,929,400

Cost and expenses:
Cost of contract
revenues 1,659,200 682,300 3,047,100 2,480,400
Cost of product sales 236,700 3,930,000 1,178,200 5,969,700
General & administrative651,200 880,600 1,344,000 1,733,500
Research and development 63,400 480,200 202,100 911,900
2,610,500 5,973,100 5,771,400 11,095,500

Loss from operations (77,200) (2,718,800) (1,070,200) (4,166,100)

Interest expense (23,900) (98,500) (99,000) (225,400)
Interest income 3,300 13,400 9,000 16,300
Loss before minority interest
and income taxes (97,800) (2,803,900) (1,160,200) (4,375,200)

Minority interest in
loss of subsidiary (114,200) (72,900) (214,100) (123,300)

Provision for income taxes 2,400 1,600 2,600 1,800

Income (loss) before
extraordinary item 14,000 (2,732,600) (948,700) (4,253,700)

Extraordinary item -
debt extinguishment -- -- 1,146,100 --

Net income (loss) $14,000 $(2,732,600) $197,400 (4,253,700)

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share:

Loss before
extraordinary item $-- $ (0.13) $(0.04) $(0.21)
Extraordinary item $-- $-- $0.05 $--

Net income (loss) $-- $(0.13) $0.01 $(0.21)

Weighted average number
of shares outstanding22,935,300 20,506,700 22,417,700 19,916,700

SOURCE: Irvine Sensors Corporation



To: Tech Master who wrote (13282)4/16/1998 11:57:00 AM
From: Andrew Vance  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 17305
 
*AV*--If memory serves me correct, you made a great play with TRBDF.
Admittedly, I have been watching both CPQ and INTC from the sidelines and have not traded either stocks.

I will do some DD on HLX based on your comment and may take a stab at it. I hope ORCL does do something since I have a small trading position I am ready to bail out of. I can wait a few more weeks, I guess.

I am kicking myself over IRSN since you did give me fair warning. As for the others, I will revisit them and make a decision. Right now I am trying to play my favorite 25 IC tech stocks around this earnings season for a few percentage points. We should also realize that something has to give real soon. Advanced technology will not be denied for much longer (3-18 months) before it explodes onto the scene. I am carefully revisiting a top 10 list for dissemination here. It will include a list of companies and why their enabling technology is critical to the survival or growth of this industry.

Good luck on your adventures next week. I will be doing some additional day travelling over the next few days so I will be erratic in my postings as well. I seem to go through cycles of nothing to cycles of "too much and not enough time"<GG>.

Andrew



To: Tech Master who wrote (13282)4/16/1998 3:52:00 PM
From: roller  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17305
 
TRBDF target of $9, but you closed the position at $5.5+ ?

Expecting problems breaking resistance at $6 or a pullback to
$5 level before an attempt at the resistance ?

I was following your leads and wondering what your take is.

-Jony



To: Tech Master who wrote (13282)4/20/1998 1:14:00 PM
From: roller  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17305
 
Tech, No need to reply to TRBDF question. Its up 35%+ today.

I had asked you last thursday for the reason you had closed TRBDF
position around $5.5+ when your target was for $9. But this
thread went MUTE since I posted the question. This morning, TRBDF opened at $8, up 2 1/4 (~36%).

Your answer is not necessary :-)

-Jony