SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (31917)4/15/1998 4:20:00 PM
From: Steve Porter  Respond to of 1577902
 
Kevin,

Don't forget those other PC's are 6 motnhs old now (review was early December.. ;-)... )

Steve

Cyrix/NSM Rule!



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (31917)4/15/1998 4:31:00 PM
From: StockMan  Respond to of 1577902
 
Spurious,
AMD's Copy of DISPOSABLE chips is around the corner...One can pick em up at the dumpster just outside of AMD.

NOTICE, most comparisons are done with systems with 512K L2 cache, not with 256K L2 which are in the low end K6 systems...

He he he he he.. K6-266 will have to be sold for less than $100. Because it needs an expensive L2 cache to match the performance of the Celeron.

Stockman



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (31917)4/15/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 1577902
 
Kevin, <The [Celery based] Deskpro EP 6266's Winstone score--15.3--was a bit lower than that of the average 233-MHz Pentium MMX PC..>
All this is really funny: I was under impression that the
Celery is supposed to compete with K6, not with their own
Pentiums.

As a PentiumMMX replacement, all reviews are very conclusive:
the Celery is no good for business. As to compete with K6,
the articles made no attempt to compare... They are obviously
trying to guard the truth that a vanilla K6-166 beats the
super-duper Celery-266 on Ziff-Davis Business Benchmarks.

Regards,

Ali