Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Logain Ablar who wrote (17988)	4/17/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50167

Tim-- I do agree with your suggestions. Views in my opinion are better articulated if I see someone on the opposite side talking exactly opposite to what I believe in. But ofcourse the credit remains where it is due. I still have greatest regard for Barton Biggs who missed the move of 2000 points from 770 to 960 and Byron Wein who also missed this move-- by the way I would loose alll credibility with my backers even if I had lost part of that move. Even earlier exit by 15 points lead to raising fingers. Such are the demands imposed on our performance.However they very remain in business. None other than Goldman Sachs Abby was sure for this break to 1130 or 9250-- I, a small fish totally understand our limited scope but in my small pond or rather a small boxed aquarium totally knowledgeful of my limitations is my own king- I don't listen to these guys and have devised my own strategies nothing taking away from all time biggest gurus. If I would miss TXN at 40 I would have never forgive myself-- listening to Kurlack I certainly would have. Same with ALTR LSCC AMAT. Corrections sometime are harbinger of greater profits and better returns. Thanks for sparing me some moments. I still believe that in context of semis these guys at Meryl will be proven wrong and I also think that it is an exercise to get the right entry. Best regards.