Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (12203)	4/16/1998 9:51:00 AM
From: Double Dipper	Respond to of 27968

LE, Looks like I'm not the only one with a memory of that post. But, INTHEFLESH is back and all is well in FAMHTASYLAND. One post and all is fine with the world. Give me a break - well at least he didn't give a noon dealine. That is progress I gusss. Kevin

To: Little Engine who wrote (12203)	4/16/1998 9:51:00 AM
From: John Fairbanks	Respond to of 27968

Ira is on the thread and I'm pretty darn happy about it. Sometimes he must feel like he's playing nursemaid to a bunch of whiny children. He gets told he needs to be more open with shareholders so he shows up here and tries to keep us abrest of progress (although obviously there is much he can't say). Then people start yelling that if a CEO actually talks to shareholders there must be something wrong with the company. So Ira leaves. I think most of us have known for a very long time that ITF is definitely Ira and I for one have been hoping he would come back. Welcome back Ira! I appreciate you taking the time to drop by here! Now, let's sit back and watch FAMH make us money... I think next week should be amazing... and it looks like we get the financials next week as soon as they have been given to the NASDAQ people. I'd say things are definitely looking good.

To: Little Engine who wrote (12203)	4/16/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: Dusty Vestal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Little Engine, Well, when I get home tonight I'll see if I can find the email, but he didn't say directly that "he wasn't INTHEFLESH", but I wrote a letter telling him how I didn't think he was intheflesh and didn't want somebody acting like him on the thread, and that if he WAS INTHEFLESH to please write me back and tell me....I also told him how great of job I thought he was doing. Anyway, when he wrote me back, he said "thanx for the support", and since he didn't say "he was intheflesh" I figured that he must not be since I told him to let me know if I was wrong thinking he wasn't INTHEFLESH..... I don't know, maybe he had a reason for denying it to a couple of people. I think he denied it to someone else on the thread too.... But all I can think of is he must have had his reasons... Dusty