SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (31968)4/16/1998 10:19:00 AM
From: Steve Porter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578105
 
Brain,

Nope.. sorry I'm not going to give this one to you that easily.. Would you say I car had a bad engine because it went slower than another car when I removed all the tires? Probably not.. You would say "what the *(^(*&^ did you take the tires off for". That's what happened with the P6..

You just can't compare them apples to apples.. and you never will be able to. Now I'm not saying the P6 arch. is great.. just saying that it is better than P5 (take a look at the arch. specs and you'll see). The key thing is that it was designed for high-speed L2.. not having high-speed L2 would be like taking the L1 out of socket 7. (no one in their right mind would do it).

Steve

Cyrix/NSM Rule!



To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (31968)4/16/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578105
 
<The cache benefits appear to be the only benefits . The proof is in the Celeron . If this processor was truly superior then there would still be improved performance without the cache >

Brian, it's not supposed to be superior, it's supposed to be cheaper.

EP