Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mp who wrote (53612)	4/16/1998 10:25:00 AM
From: Joseph Pareti	Respond to of 186894

INTC pairing the early losses $74 5/16 at 10:07 EST the market is smarter than Kurlak

To: mp who wrote (53612)	4/16/1998 10:27:00 AM
From: Home-Run	Respond to of 186894

Looks like Tom Kurlak is trying to do the same thing to TXN. But it seems TXN has more staying power than this dog: To: +Jacob Williams (3459 ) From: +Just_Observing Thursday, Apr 16 1998 10:01AM ET Reply # of 3460 Tom Kurlak lowers TXN eps from $2 to $1.60 for this year but he has been wrong on TXN for a while. After the previous release in January, he did not like the stock at $48. The stock proved him wrong. All info courtesy of my ML broker. Good Luck

To: mp who wrote (53612)	4/16/1998 10:27:00 AM
From: Dorine Essey	Respond to of 186894

Looks to me that INTC is bouncing right back. Was as low as 73 3/16 and now is trading at 74 3/16. I can't believe that TURKEY actually denied what he said yesterday.

To: mp who wrote (53612)	4/16/1998 2:25:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

mp, let us....track the track record of the EMPEROR and see if he really does have any clothes.... Let's start with last years results in The Wall Street Journal's annual All-Star Analysts Survey. The survey is conducted by Zacks Investment Research and ranks analysts by stock-picking skill and by earnings-estimate accuracy. The link provide names of analysts who made the list along with the names of their firms, and their rankings, as reported by The Wall Street Journal. In 1997 Tom Kurlak did not make the semiconductor analyst's list for stock-picking skill and came in fifth (for his first appearance on the list) for earnings estimate accuracy. multexnet.com Does anyone know anything about Kurlak's family background, academic credentials, technical experience, and work history? This information may help us to determine if Kurlak's opinions are based on fundamental research or if he has been fooling us with pshycological manipulations using the resources of Merril Lynch for cover. In any case, it is imperative for us to find out. If he is legitimate and he is right a signifcant portion of the time, there is no use for us to fight it and lose money in the process. I'm not into losing money to prove a point. Regards, Mary Cluney