Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GP Kavanaugh who wrote (3713)	4/16/1998 4:38:00 PM
From: K A Anderson	Respond to of 6654

CVIA thread.... Yes I have been in contact with numerous attornies today, and yes they are all interested, in fact enthusistic over pursuing this matter. Now I have had several messages relayed to me to call Mr Arnold, so I will here shortly, I am going to approach this with an open mind and try to be objective, I have supported CVIA since Oct. and do not like this course of action either, but I fully intend to protect my investment, just as many of you seem to be willing to do. Maybe just maybe we can come to a compromise, or some type of solution without either side loosing. I intend to call him around 530 pm EST so if anyone wants to relay any type of thoughts or questions that you feel need to be asked feel free to PM me. KAA

To: GP Kavanaugh who wrote (3713)	4/16/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: dexx	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6654

To all: As a previous shareholder of CVIA stock, I check in on it once in a while. Having read some of the posts on a thread which used to be a most civil one, I must say that the content has changed dramatically (and not for the better). While I can understand the discontent among those still holding shares, I do not understand the loose threats of legal action over a company that had no assets, no office, no revenues, no employees and no business. Based on that formula, technically all of the shares of CVIA had the following value: $0.00. With the emergence of this new WOTD company and the $3.5 Million acquisition it brings with it, CVIA has a chance to put some real tangible value back in the stock (even if the stock is reversed 300 to 1). Those of you (K.A.A. etc.) who are complaining about dilution of 96% are nuts...yes, nuts. This company was worthless. In fact, I believe at one point, Jack Arnold was paying for the office space and phone himself. You can't dilute $0.00 value stock (in real terms, not MM terms). Now I see K.A.A. is launching a legal attack against CVIA and WOTD claiming K.A.A. and his cheerleaders have been screwed, when in reality, had it not been for Jack Arnold, this shell wouldn't even exist. I recall the previous officers of the company were the ones that ripped off CVIA's assets and left Jack holding an empty bag. I hope K.A.A. and those supporting his efforts realize that they will have a difficult time explaining to a judge how their valueless stock was further devalued. Also, should they lose their case, K.A.A and possibly others would personally be subject to counter lawsuits by CVIA and WOTD. Well, I am on to threads of stocks I currently own. BTW, I noticed some of you were bashing Wayne J. in earlier posts. Wayne has proven his value on this and other threads many times over...so those who bashed him have only exposed themselves as idiots. Dexx