Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CyberCash a buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David H. Zimmer who wrote (1054)	4/17/1998 12:05:00 AM
From: iceburg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3990

David, Your only bonehead move is VRTL :-). Relativly speaking (to other Internet stocks) CYCH is a steal under $60. I am going to double down tomorrow after the weenie sell off. Hoping to buy at 24 1/8. Compare this to Yahoo, Excite or whatever and I start giggling. Revenues are quantifiable and ramp up much more predictably. This press alone should give CYCH a lift, buy out or not. By the way, I bought this stock at $48, looking for a quick trade (in '96). I went to sell it at $54 but my broker wasn't in and by the time he called me back it was $51. I told him to hold off. I sold it at $36 a week later. The opposite is about to occur, cych's time has come. Steve

To: David H. Zimmer who wrote (1054)	4/17/1998 12:37:00 AM
From: TLindt	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3990

Dave you might be right on that one.......excerpt from Yahoo! In a prepared statement, CyberCash spokeswoman Jordanna Taffel said: ''James Condon, chief executive officer, Bill Melton, president and chief executive officer and Russ Stevens, general counsel, firmly state there have been no discussions of an acquisition of CyberCash.'' biz.yahoo.com You're familiar with the law I assume......how many times do you get a co-authored statement from management and counsel declining a rumor? Usually you get the.......'a spokesperson for the company said the do not comment on rumors' Sharp contrast.....between the two. Why?