Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (53750)	4/17/1998 2:31:00 AM
From: TTOSBT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Sonny, Re: >"Jules and All. Article about TK's downgrade with a price target of 60. Go down to "Chips retreat". cbs.marketwatch.com; You know things are getting pretty bad whey they refer a 1 9/16 rise in TXN as a surge! TTOSBT

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (53750)	4/17/1998 9:25:00 AM
From: Larry Loeb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Sonny, Jules and All. Article about TK's downgrade with a price target of 60. Go down to "Chips retreat". cbs.marketwatch.com; The last time Kurlak made such a call was in March of 1996 when Intel was in the 50's and he said it was going to the 40's. It bottomed at 49.5 and then went, pretty much, straight up to $180. If that was the only indicator I used, I would buy as much as I possibly could. However, at the time he was making a bad judgment relating to what was occurring in the RAM market and extrapolating it to INTC. This time the accuracy of his logic is questionable, but less so. JMO Interested in other opinions. Larry