Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jan A. Van Hummel who wrote (11953)	4/17/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: citydi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Hi Everyone ~ I'm having a hard time with this 2.687, any thoughts? Citydi

To: Jan A. Van Hummel who wrote (11953)	4/17/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 20681

Until recently, I thought it was just the former management. Now I'm not sure myself. JLA

To: Jan A. Van Hummel who wrote (11953)	4/17/1998 1:27:00 PM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Jan, IMO, the answer is that they probably dont have the checkered background of Naxos and the rest of the dirts. They also probably are using conventional methods and are not associated with the unconventional methodologies that Naxos and the dirts have been associated with. They are also probably not claiming to have the "worlds largest" anything. It is that history,IMO, that causes people to discount the factual proof that Naxos has already put on the table. While what we have proven to this point is little more than an impressive start, I think that level of proof would be generating more interest from the general marketplace if it werent coming from a desert dirt and naxos in particular. JMHO, Mark Comments appreciated