Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas C. White who wrote (9920)	4/17/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Grainne	Respond to of 71178

Thomas, on my second post, I was just throwing a concept out for discussion. I often do this, and while I am a little concerned about someone being in prison for something that is no longer illegal because of the passage of time, I really hadn't thought the whole thing through. Of course, your position is a little analogous to the Clintonistas arguing that it is irrelevant whether he committed perjury in the Paula Jones depositions because testimony about Monica Lewinsky was ruled inadmissible there. I added supervised taking of Mary Le Tourneau's medication, and ankle braceleting so that her whereabouts could be monitored, to probation and counseling. My belief is that all of this would have made a difference, although I cannot prove it, of course. This is a fascinating case. I really wonder whether they will stay in love, or the young man will grow up and go off in a different direction entirely. I definitely think he deserves time and space away from Mary, to try to develop properly.