Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (14990)	4/17/1998 2:36:00 PM
From: R. Bond	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

C.R., I'm checking out CMED. If you bought it one year ago you'd be looking at a 230% profit. Up 11% today. As a 'play', not too shabby. The Internet sector, Y2K stocks......... you can drive yourself nuts insisting that they conform to the traditional rules of fundamentals. At the moment, pinpoint timing is in order to place a short position with some of these bad boys. I have done it and shall do it again. But not based on fundamentals or my attitude. And certainly not against the trend. This is the Nineties, man. Cheers, Bond

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (14990)	4/17/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: Steve Sanchez	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

mr. CalculatedRisk says: "Check out CMED closely" a couple of quick points about CMED: - ISO 9001 and EN 46001 Certified cmed.com - NMS listed Message 2519811 steve

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (14990)	4/17/1998 2:53:00 PM
From: Josef Svejk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Humble request, CR, can you please be a bit more specific regarding CMED? "ROFLMAO" seems just a tad vague. Thanks in advance, Svejk (GL-15 applies: digiserve.com ;-)

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (14990)	4/17/1998 2:56:00 PM
From: Olu Emuleomo	Respond to of 31646

The CMED chart looks kinda suspicious. I think I see a bearish Head-and-Shoulder formation there. Wont touch it until it hits $11. BTW, TAVA also looks suspicious (inverse 'W'), although I'm bullish. But would like to see $15 b/4 re-entering! --Olu E.