Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ken foxx who wrote (16648)	4/17/1998 3:08:00 PM
From: Steven Angelil	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

Well, Ken, Curly has been aruond a hell of a lot longer than you. At first his posts turned me off a bit, but after a while, you start to believe. COme on Ken, be a bleiver! Steve

To: ken foxx who wrote (16648)	4/17/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: BillyG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

Ken, you need to read a few more posts before you lash out at people. There has been a lot of discussion on this thread of the good, bad, and the ugly, and Curly has been right in the middle of it with good information. We have discussed alternative technologies such as x-ray lithography and Scalpel ad nauseum. Guess what? Recent tests at the University of Texas and elsewhere proved that DUV is the way to go for .08 micron and beyond. The Coherent story has been played time and again, but thus far has failed to materialize, while CYMI lengthens its lead. Hell yes, everyone here cares about competition. There will be competition for CYMI's business. However, we care more about about substantiated facts than self-serving press releases. Speaking of facts, I noticed your post: exchange2000.com I can find free screening programs. I can find free buy-side advice. I cannot find nay-sayers. I would pay for this. I've noticed that SI cautions and removes posters and messages that offend company investors. At that point SI becomes gossip. Not a serious discussion of investment principal. My sense is that the information content of Yahoo has surpassed SI. The only problem with Yahoo is the layout. It remains cumbersome to scan through the messages on that board. Can you show us single example of, as you claim, SI removing either "posters" or "messages" that offend company investors?

To: ken foxx who wrote (16648)	4/17/1998 3:26:00 PM
From: Curlton Latts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

ken: Since you are only a new visitor to SI perhaps you haven't read the terms of use. B. You agree not to use the service for illegal purposes or for the transmission of material that is unlawful, harassing, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, tortious, improper or otherwise objectionable , or that infringes or may infringe the intellectual property or other rights of another. I suggest you do so before addressing others like you have me. Did you forget to take your medication this morning ken? You sound disturbed and frustrated. Good Luck To Each And All Curly ~~~~~~~^^ [6.6] .....> [_]

To: ken foxx who wrote (16648)	4/17/1998 3:28:00 PM
From: FJB	Respond to of 25960

You're a sick little puppy to become so vicious so quickly. Anyway, I expect you will be ignored from now on. Well, it's not like you had something important to say anyway. When you said, "Maybe I don't know enough" that was a tremendous understatement. Good luck to you anyway and please mellow out.