SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: WTDEC who wrote (19213)4/17/1998 10:22:00 PM
From: squetch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
WTDEC, What areas or companies do they find cheap in the bio area? squetch



To: WTDEC who wrote (19213)4/17/1998 10:25:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
Walter, The recent H&Q report on Biotechs also indicated that a rally is just around the corner.



To: WTDEC who wrote (19213)4/17/1998 10:27:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
Speaking of VCs and Biotechs:
Nanogen raises millions with IPO

Thomas Kupper
STAFF WRITER | Bloomberg News contributed to this report.

15-Apr-1998 Wednesday

Nanogen Inc. raised $42.9 million yesterday in the first initial public
offering by an independent biotech company in San Diego in nearly a year.

It was the latest example of the emergence of a new type of biotech that
aims not to discover and market drugs but to develop technologies to help
other companies do so.

Nanogen's product is a microchip with millimeter-sized probes that enables
researchers to rapidly identify samples. Eventually, the company thinks it
also could be used in genetic testing or diagnostics.

Despite a tough market for biotech stocks, investors have remained somewhat
receptive to such "toolbox" biotechs on the theory that they are less risky
and more likely to make money in the short term.

In the year's first quarter, a particularly slow one for biotech IPOs, only
three U.S. biotechs went public. Two of them, LJL Biosystems of Sunnyvale
and Connecticut-based CuraGen, were toolbox companies.

Weak performance

Eddie Hedaya, an analyst with BioVest Research, pointed to the relatively
weak performance of drug-development biotechs compared with large drug
companies such as Merck & Co. to explain the trend.

"It's a pick-and-choose game," Hedaya said. "And it's easier for
institutional investors not to pick and choose if they can get their 50
percent by investing in Merck."

Nanogen sold 3.9 million shares at $11 each and saw them rise as high as
$12.31 1/4 before retreating to close at $11.25. That valued the company at
around $200 million, already among the top dozen local biotechs.

Still, the company remains in the development stage. Losses grew to $11.2
million last year from $7.8 million in 1996, and the company received just
$3.4 million in 1997 revenue.

The company is headed by Howard Birndorf, 48, formerly chief executive of
Ligand Pharmaceuticals and before that a vice president at Hybritech, the
first local biotech.

Along with Birndorf's 6.7 percent Nanogen stake, worth more than $13
million at the closing price, the company's top investors include the
venture capitalists Enterprise Partners and Kleiner, Perkins, Caulfield &
Byers.

Together the two firms control almost 15 percent of the stock.

Biotechs struggling

In the local biotech sector, completing the offering was an unusual
success. The last company to go public was another toolbox, Aurora
Biosciences, which raised $40 million in June 1997.

Dura Pharmaceuticals also raised $88 million in a December offering for its
Spiros Development Corp., which is developing a new type of inhaler.

Biotechs in general have struggled since last October's market collapse.
Though the sector rallied somewhat in March, the Amex Biotechnology Index
remains 11 percent below an October peak.

Jim McCamant, editor of the Medical Technology Stock Letter, said the
Nanogen offering might reflect an improvement in the market for biotech
IPOs, though not a recovery.