SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nanda who wrote (11059)4/17/1998 11:57:00 PM
From: ThirdEye  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13949
 
Story today in the business section of SF Chronicle(too lazy to find link right now)about CA legislature considering a bill to exempt businesses from Y2K liability. As much as we all might regard the pending liability sweepstakes as a catastrophically expensive sideshow to the pending Y2K disasters, causing businesses to avoid admitting they even have a problem, the possibility that businesses might become exempt from litigation is even worse. There will be no further incentive to find and fix in time, (except the motivation to profit)knowing that they cannot be sued no matter what happens. If CA passes this law, most of the biggest high tech firms will be breathing a HUGE sigh of relief.

Passage is certainly not a slam dunk, but it pits attorneys(who do not really produce anything) against businesses (which do). Where would your sentiments lie? Tough call.



To: Nanda who wrote (11059)4/18/1998 2:17:00 PM
From: paul e thomas  Respond to of 13949
 
IMRS AQUISITION
With the strong runup in IMRS price,some rough calculations show IMRS ought to be able to make aquisitions that would increase revenue by 50% without diluting the existing number of shares by more than 20%. I look to overseas aquisitions being announced within the next 3 months.I believe this will be the catalyst for the next leg of a further runup in IMRS price.