Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark silvers who wrote (11970)	4/18/1998 12:46:00 PM
From: mfgrep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Mark-- I am very much in agreement. Has anyone given thought to the possibility that that there have been numbers released to corporate that weren't so hot? and that these number were most likely not released to the shareholders/public. I did say "possibility" above. I am not being pessimistic.....and the above is just speculation, however, this is a very possible scenario. Regardless I agree with Stoop-man in that regardless of F.L., J/L, Bre-X, Jimmy J., and all the other issues Naxos is a "BUY" right now. Even if there isn't an ounce of gold (which there is) the stock has enough interest intrinsically to push the stock a few points above its current level. Regards, Jason P.S. Henry...I'll be leaving town for a couple of days...gotta go to Minneapolis till Tuesday night...If you have any more questions please phone my receptionist...

To: mark silvers who wrote (11970)	4/18/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Respond to of 20681

Mark, I agree with every word of your post. I strongly believe that we are entering into a key period for Naxos. It will be very important to proceed with the drilling and testing of Franklin Lake in a calm and professional manner. I am ecstatic that the past history of leaks and over hyped fantasy has been put behind us. I am content to wait for the information to be released when it has been competently gathered and verified. It is important to realize that this company needs to put a lot of distance between itself and its past. Wether the past string of hyped rumours were the result of over exuberant amateurs or manipulative practices it is a legacy that is part of the hangover that currently plagues the stock. If part of the price of pushing this legacy into the past is that we don't get info and rumours as frequently as in the past it is a price I am willing to pay. Henry