Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Seeker2007 who wrote (24562)	4/18/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: rudedog	Respond to of 97611

did you look at Message 4110201 this lawsuit is empty and will go nowhere because the basis is wrong.

To: Seeker2007 who wrote (24562)	4/20/1998 5:06:00 PM
From: Lynn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

I find it odd that the law firm is looking for a "lead plaintiff" in the pending suit. From the law firm's news item at: biz.yahoo.com "If you are a member of the class described above, you may, not later than June 16, 1998, move the court to serve as lead plaintiff of the class, if you so choose. In order to serve as lead plaintiff, however, you must meet certain legal requirements..." Does it strike anyone else as odd that there's a pending case yet the plaintiff still has to be determined? Lynn