To: Hardrocker who wrote (67 ) 4/18/1998 2:09:00 PM From: Shaquapa Respond to of 400
Hardrocker, I responded to you over in AGTI as well. For the GMTC people, (if there are any) I'll address your post here. 1. I came to the AGTI board because I was a stockholder. I am also interested in bingo stocks in particular. Why do you see this as a our board - your board thing. I have owned stock in both. Isn't the purpose of these boards to share and discuss (or argue as the case may be) information? 2. I would welcome your comments on GMTC here. As I stated earlier, you are one of the few who have a reasoned approach and would welcome your observations. The number of posts on AGTI versus GMTC is simply a matter of activity. GMTC has had only 60+ reponses since it was started. AGTI gets that many in a few days. I've tried to stir up some information here, but apparently there is little interest. 3. I would challenge your assertion that I am trying to trash AGTI. When one company is tainted with incorrect information, other companies in similar businesses will get painted with the same brush. I have lost money because of incorrect information (a nice way to say lies). I would have welcomed someone pointing that out to me. I also welcome your thoughts on GMTC. 4. I have tried to get a discussion going here on the GMTC thread but nobody's listening. GMTC has weaknesses too. They have done some really bonehead things (TSBN for example). But there doesn't seem to be dissemination of incorrect facts on this thread. 5. The shareholder suit is real. It was announced yesterday, and "advertised" for 3 other times. I have read the suit (I requested info from the attorney) and would be happy to discuss if anybody is interested. The progressive bingo has been detailed in press releases as well. It is on hold due to legal questions. As for the ventures in the Pacific Rim - I agree that $$$ have been spent and wasted on these projects. I think the GMTC stockholders are a little more forgiving because the earnings keep going up. 6. I believe your conclusion that tsg59 is worried (although I'm not quite sure why you lumped me in with him) about Texas is inaccurate, but at least I understand your reasoning. I would think that BTC and Fortunet are providing the pressure, if any, on tgs59. I agree that competition is good for the industry. Electronic penetration in the United States alone is minimal. Further, I think dissenting opinions and views/spins on facts is also good. I invite you to post your observations, facts, opinions, views here on the GMTC thread. I like to know the good and the bad. Lastly, you have taken offense to my acid responses to the slams. I must admit that I do get a perverted thrill flaming the ignorant, but I will try and bite my tongue to some degree in the future. Looking forward to your thoughts, good and bad, regarding GMTC. BTW - what other stocks interest you. I bought into ABMI lately. Although still a penny, they seem to have potential. I've also been looking hard at CIST. Haven't bought yet, but the price is less than CURRENT assets. Hmmm...... where's Gordon Gecko when you need him <G>