Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pierre J. LeBel who wrote (2031)	4/18/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: Veritas	Respond to of 8117

I managed to average down at 4.50. I'm betting on this technology to become a staple in the industry. It's simple in construction, economical to purchase, patent-protected (soon world-wide), and far better than comparable, existing products. If this one can't win a place in the market, nothing can. We can lose only through mis-management.

To: Pierre J. LeBel who wrote (2031)	4/18/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: Mark S. Schroeder	Respond to of 8117

Economist? I have no faith in their forecasts. JMHO Dr Yardeni is a well known and respected economist, well maybe so. They do throw alot of darts missing the board most of the time. We have companies out there and one that I know of which can fix the bug for the year 2000, yet others are working very hard and long to get it done. I rode the one company that has the fix from $3 to $55 in the short period they ran. The fix still needs work, lots of work. As for PYNG, what's happening now is healthy for the stock and I read charts more than anything. Compare charts on v.kls to v.pyt. similar difference there. The last news release is a setup for next weeks news IMHO. New life will be in this stock soon again. We have support at and above the $4C level. Lets see what next week brings. MSS

To: Pierre J. LeBel who wrote (2031)	4/18/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: Gary H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Pierre, You wrote, <As such, yes, it is very probable that Pyng will be negatively affected as hospitals worldwide will have less money to spend on such new products.> Actually I was thinking in terms of FAST1 being a more necessary item in critical times such as we will be facing come the Y2K. There is the possibility of more emergency cases and FAST1 may just be a cheaper quick fix. The list of things that can go wrong(via Y2k) are too much to mention here which can be any number of mishaps and accidents. It may be a tool suited to the time.

To: Pierre J. LeBel who wrote (2031)	4/19/1998 8:26:00 PM
From: fast-tracker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Pierre: I wonder about your purpose in this line of discussion. Are you a) pushing shares in one of the companies with a year 2000 patch, or b) holding shorts on Pyng? Personnel costs make up more than 80% of health care budgets. The amount that is spent on health care products is a small budget item and and is watched closely but rarely comes under major attack. Two points you should know about the FAST1 - 1) in the hospital environment, it will be used instead of central lines, which are of an equivalent price; 2) The savings in terms of health care costs because of improved patient outcome will be significant, so the FAST1 will not be hard to justify in any Emergency Department or Ambulance Service budget. Health care cuts do not mean that critically ill and injured patients will be left to die on a stretcher in the emergency department! If we followed your line of thinking, anyone with any investment in any company that owns more than one computer (or does business with any company that owns more than one computer) had better bail out now. The year 2000 bug is a nasty one, but the need for emergency health care is not going to change. Two years from now, when someone needs to get vascular access in a hurry and the peripheral veins have collapsed, they'll be reaching for the FAST1, and we'll be on the way to the bank. Fast-tracker