SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dougjn who wrote (3859)4/18/1998 5:20:00 PM
From: Estephen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Here's is some propaganda that states sldram is cheaper. However, it seems to me that the high pin count would make it more costly. I've read several anaylsis by industry players that the first rambus chips will be a about 10% more that current dram and fall
to 1 or 2% more in mass production. Also, the statement that rdram isn't good for workstation is nonsense. Obviously, this guy is spinning a tell to promote sldram.

pubs.cmpnet.com

RACE FOR NEXT DRAMS...
The race to become the next-generation DRAM is still wide open. Even product extensions of current parts like double-data-rate DRAMs stand a chance. Despite Intel's attempts to promote the Direct Rambus architecture across all systems starting in '99, a number of PC makers are designing high-end systems that use alternative SLDRAM and DDR DRAMs now under development.
At least two top-tier systems companies are developing core logic that will conform to the modified SSTL interface used for SLDRAMs, sources tell Anthony Cataldo of EE Times. DRAM vendors also report a flurry of design activity for DDR SDRAMs. With Micron Technology about to ship its own SLDRAMs, its Micron Electronics subsidiary may start producing SLDRAM core logic this fall.

...MAY SPLINTER DRAM BIZ
Some observers predict the DRAM industry may wind up splintering along applications lines. "Customers are suddenly ... finding that Rambus isn't going to work in laptops and is too expensive for sub-$1,000 PCs," says Fujitsu VP George Robillard. "And it doesn't work well in servers and workstations, but it's probably a good for the desktop. It turns out that a synchronous DRAM is right for sub-$1,000 and laptops, and DDR is good for workstations and servers," he tells EE Times.



To: dougjn who wrote (3859)4/18/1998 10:03:00 PM
From: Ibexx  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
dougjn,

Please re-read one of Shibumi's posts on this thread.

The technical limitation of SLDRAM is really the basis of decision beyond 1999 after Merced becomes available.

Ibexx