Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Arconenergy, Inc. (Long Term Investors and Fundamentals) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Redfisherman who wrote (895)	4/19/1998 4:20:00 AM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1757

In the words of my farther god rest his soul... WHO THE DEVIL ARE YOU? You are obviously a harmful plant. With the management restructuring I am beginning to question if you are anything that you say. You are here with intentions create doubt. Give a poster long enough and the truth comes out. You have not read anything what so ever on the three thread started. A lot of your questions have been answered in the posts opn those threads. I also notice you will not match horns with me at all. Instead of questioning management I question just who you are and now your motive. I think you have served a great purpose this weekend like others that have come here. This poster has a venegence with the company and it is obvious... can someone tell me how I know this? GaBard C'mon Gordon lock horns with me. I have a copy of your profile you did before you erased it. Wonder if anyone with your name does in fact work for Exxon. Lets rock and roll. Should have left before you exposed yourself. I have copied all posts and faxing to Arcon Monday. Keep on posting.

To: Redfisherman who wrote (895)	4/19/1998 5:01:00 AM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1757

LOL. One of the ways to become extremely successfull in a competitive business is to offer a superior product and (if possible & with decent profits) undercut your competitors. I need to do more reasearch into what the value of an octane barrel index is, but for now I'm going to assign a value of $2 (that is a lot more than $1.28 percentage-wise). If they sell for $1.28 (which you saw is low) and it costs Arcon .88, they still make about a 50% profit. Assuming that the index price is $2, the cost for everybody else (assuming that they desire a 50% profit also) is $1.33. Yep. That's right everybody else would lose $.05/gallon if they tried to match Arcon's price, and if they did Arcon could lower their price to $1/gallon (and still make a profit) vs a loss of $.33/gallon. And I'd never have thought of this scenario until you pointed it out. You've helped me really appreciate what Arcon has got here. Even if you are right about the DF-144, this company still has the natural gas&oil fields and will be profitable. Something else to consider, instead of Arcon having to buy natural gas for the manufacturing of the DF-144 they can get it from their fields AT EXTRACTION COST. Kurt