Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ally who wrote (8301)	4/19/1998 11:58:00 AM
From: r.edwards	Respond to of 10836

Nice landing Denise, what a beautiful canopy you have. you probably just got in on the next run-up to $7 U.S.

To: Ally who wrote (8301)	4/19/1998 12:55:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

They needed to go to court because the MEM had resolutions, which are not titular, to allow CVG to mine there. They had given the gold rights and copper rights to CVG. CVG lacks title. KRY has title. So the court decision we have been waiting for for one year is to nullify the CVG rights to these metals on LC 4 and 6 as published by the MEM. Dome knows pertty well what the decision will be as the motions to have these motions of KRY's suppressed have been dealt with by the courts and some feedback would be inevitable. This does not mean that would tell the truth about the weakness in their case. The motions before the admittance court to have the 11 motions of KRY's suppressed ont he basis of the non-ownership of the claims due to the invalidity of the Lemon-Torres-Mael transfer was disallowed at that stage. It is a matter of contention whether it has already been dealt with. We shall see. echarter@vianet.on.ca The Canadian Mining Newsletter