Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Hill who wrote (11990)	4/19/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

OFF TOPIC: Does anyone know if under Canadian law there is a theory which would allow the Company to recover against an individual who spreads obvious lies and half truths in order to damage the Company? I've successfully prosecuted a few of these in the US. Is it possible in Canada? Any Canadian Lawyers out there? JLA

To: Tim Hill who wrote (11990)	4/19/1998 11:24:00 AM
From: Tim Hill	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 20681

To all: It is obvious this thread is intolerant of any opposing opinion so I will stop posting here. It probably reflects on the shaky status of this stock to see the despicable private messages I am receiving. So much for free speech in America.

To: Tim Hill who wrote (11990)	4/19/1998 3:05:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Respond to of 20681

Tim, you state It is very easy to hire consultants and given them instructions on what to do and then claim chain of custody. No legitimate chain of custody has been verified with any documents. nonsense chain of custody has be clearly verified by Behre-Dolbear, Ledoux, Rocky Mountain and CMRI. This has been discussed on this thread numerous times. Your raising of this bogus documentation issue clearly identifies you as one more of the fake identities of HungryLion/Dick Hoaxland et al. 8 days and counting till your back on Yahoo, an appropriately named site for you. Henry