Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cellhigh who wrote (3147)	4/19/1998 1:43:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

i can hear em now"you dont have anything to offer the board" basically the only thing he did was down talk a 5 bagger The posts I read seem to be opinions to me. Not arrogant. In either case, these a tricky stocks that require dicipline. Glenn

To: cellhigh who wrote (3147)	4/19/1998 2:15:00 PM
From: Tom D	Respond to of 164684

No, I don't mean that at all, Ron. For example, when Candlestick posted #577, the stock went from $60 straight down to $44 over the next 13 days. Candlestick is very smart and I respect his opinions. As I have said before, CandleStick brings a lot of info to the thread, and it is extremely difficult for him or anybody to call the top on a stock that breaks out with new highs so regularly. I just think this stock is tough to predict. Probably because of the unpredictable optimism about the future of internet commerce, it has not been following rules of fundamental analysis so far, and it is hard to know when it will. My point is, maybe you and I should have a protracted discussion about whether the stock is going to be worth $600 vs. $650 per share in the year 2001. It would be as valuable to the thread as the current debate about $1.49 per share vs. $.05 per share. And while we get wrapped up in our postings, we won't be concerned about the upcoming quarterly earnings report, which is likely to be completely contrary to our investment strategy. Best Regards, Tom D