Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GULL who wrote (888)	4/19/1998 5:34:00 PM
From: MNorth	Respond to of 7235

Thanks for the info Gull. My line of thinking comes from the statement "despite existing legislation". If suf and rg have covered their avenues regarding "existing legislation" and the constitution was recent, perhaps it gave the "heirs" a toehold for their case. The time factor I had in mind would be related to the two year period for the claim by the heirs. Some would be of the opinion that private ownership or inheritance of land and mineral rights could be a individual right to be protected. Just my thoughts.