SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ThirdEye who wrote (11084)4/19/1998 7:44:00 PM
From: Cosmo Kramer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13949
 
I always wondered why someone hasn't done a test regarding the Y2k problem by advancing a computer to 12/31/99 and letting it change to 1/1/2000 and see what happens??? Must be a reason, it's too simple an idea. Just curious.

BTW, I believe the Y2k problem is real.

Cheers,
Mark



To: ThirdEye who wrote (11084)4/19/1998 9:16:00 PM
From: sibe  Respond to of 13949
 
Sibe: I sent a long wide-ranging and somewhat caustic email to that
writer, suggesting at the very least that she pick up a copy of current
Fortune. Her research was hardly worthy of the term.
--taoman

Dear taoman,
Feel free to post that e-mail here. Make necessary modifications to clean it up. Or e-mail it to me.



To: ThirdEye who wrote (11084)4/20/1998 10:39:00 AM
From: RikRichter  Respond to of 13949
 
IAIC's UNICAST/2000 In Y2K Factory In Malaysia; Y2K Remediation Deal Inked with Computer Associates and Software International:

biz.yahoo.com