Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (26061)	4/20/1998 10:48:00 AM
From: Scott Sterling	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 33344

Something strange in the roadmap? 2H98 1.8V core, 3.3V I/O, CMOS 6x manufacturing process PR266 (75/225), PR266 (83/208), PR300 (83/250), PR333 (100/250) 1999 Socket-7 PR300 (83/250), PR333 (100/250), PR366 (100/300) 1999 Slot-1 (This isn't a typo <g>) PR333 (100/250), PR350 (100/300), PR400 (100/350) Why is the Socket 7 100/300 rated higher than the Slot 1 100/300? I would figure it would be the other way around. Also, it seems that the PR ratings become much more reflective of Mhz from the PR350 on forward as Intel switches to a 100 Mhz bus. And unfortunately no mention of when the M II will be Cayennized, which would truly make it worthy (and then some) of these PR ratings. (1.8 volts? oh no.. time to throw my 2.5 V min motherboard into the garbage unless the C6+ uses that) --Scott