Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INFORMATION ANALYSIS (IAIC) - YEAR 2000 Date Remediation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matthew F. Kern who wrote (1475)	4/20/1998 10:37:00 AM
From: RikRichter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2011

IAIC's UNICAST/2000 In Y2K Factory In Malaysia: biz.yahoo.com

To: Matthew F. Kern who wrote (1475)	4/20/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2011

Matt, upon occasion, I am a shorter. I post when I do, and I post why, when I do. I am not in ANY position in IAIC at the moment, FYI. Contrary to most who rail against shorters, it is not illegal, unethical, or unAmerican! Please read further... The reason for my post is this: I short based on technical indicators which indicate short-term overbot conditions. The reason is purely one of making money, like you do. You see, not everyone buys and holds. Some buy to sell. Those short-term players playable dips (from overbot conditions) provide the leaven in the stock, i.e., keep it from going crazy on the upside when PUBLIC news and/or fundamental analysis doesn't warrant it. Another way to put it, is that shorters skim froth. Also, I wouldn't give you a plugged nickel for a poster who doesn't talk their position! It is always best to plug in this human bias when reading or listening to ANY investor's commentary. Good investing/trading to you. O/49r