Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (53168)	4/20/1998 8:13:00 PM
From: Naggrachi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

<<Terrible. But I made 5 digits on it>> RIGHT OON, BROTHER!!!! Will, since your a good contrarian indicator, the day you posted how you loved SMOD was the day I shorted it. I covered my short at the bottom and made a tidy profit. :-) It's so easy to make trades, in retrospect, isn't Kenny? Oh my God, those bastards killed Kenny!! :-0) Zead

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (53168)	4/20/1998 9:12:00 PM
From: jackdog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

<< Oh, by the way, how's SMOD doing? >> Terrible. But I made 5 digits on it. <<>> Yeah but 2 of those digits were after the decimal point =:-O. Pomaranski is worse then Rocky, he's just a spook who pops in from time to time to drop a scare tactic or two depending on what his position is. The worst kind of garbage poster. At least Rocky isn't wishy-washy. Pomaranski, post some realtime trades, maybe you'd fair better in the credibility dept. +350% is easy to do in the confines of your imagination. Go pester AMZN, which of course you've never lost a nickel on either. LOL, Jack