Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BORL: Time to BUY! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dongyan Wang who wrote (10044)	4/21/1998 4:24:00 PM
From: Bipin Prasad	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Where did you get it from? Are you short on BORL or something?

To: Dongyan Wang who wrote (10044)	4/21/1998 4:26:00 PM
From: shane forbes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Just great (sarcasm). See my post 10034 on my concerns about the idiotic 0.05 which I said just looked way too high and which I hoped was not considered the "street estimate". 0.03 is what I would have expected. The problem is whether the less well informed now consider the 0.03 a 2 cent miss. Would still guess the forward looking comments are good. But not sure now about n/t. OK - double checked with Briefing.com - now they are saying the 0.03 is 1 cent ABOVE First Call mean which is the way I like to see the news - beating estimates!!! (Side note: I spoke to IR around 1:30 EST today and told them about Briefing.com's 5 cents on yesterday's page and the weird all over the board estimates. Denise was not at all happy with the Briefing.com number (as I mentioned to her it flied in the face of last q's comments and seemed too high) and said she would call them and tell them to fix the number. Looks like she did! WEll DONE DENISE. Now I am HAPPY!! VERY HAPPY!) Well done BORL - continue beating those estimates! My best kind of stock behavior!! Shane.