Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Tusk Energy (TKE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kingfisher who wrote (297)	4/21/1998 7:47:00 PM
From: saif	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1207

They left a lot to read between the lines. It is a guessing game now, and my guess is that this tight hole is not dry ! Omer

To: kingfisher who wrote (297)	4/21/1998 11:56:00 PM
From: grayhairs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1207

Hi Richard, Was the leak "allowed"? Was there "panic"? Not with TKE, IMHO. We did see a modest retraction on a relatively small volume of "spec" stock that jumped the gun to get out. But that setback was minimal because of the value of previously announced Meekwap development and what we believed to be uphole value at Strachan. In our industry "tight holes" are common place. If one is spending the kind of $$ required to drill this well, you want to retain as much info as possible confidential so that you can "push the boundaries" of the play as economically as possible. What I find ironic is that WE the shareholders want to know absolutely every minute detail about OUR well and WE put all sorts of pressure upon the officers and directors of OUR company to constantly release details/data to us. What WE do not grasp is the fact that when WE do that, WE make it difficult for OUR company to retain a competitive advantage that has cost millions. AND, WE VERY QUICKLY START COSTING OURSELVES!!!! Later grayhairs