Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 7th Level -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Deeber who wrote (634)	4/21/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: Kimberly Lee	Respond to of 1019

In their feature presentation, Briefing.com was badmouthing MARG on Monday too, calling the news 6 month old news, but that didn't prevent MARG from gapping up 100%+ at the open and from gaining 200%+ today. In this market, momentum, perceptions, and bullish psychology count far more than anything else, at least as far as short-termed trading is concerned.

To: Deeber who wrote (634)	4/21/1998 9:50:00 PM
From: Matthew Cooper	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1019

I think you misunderstood. I shorted at 9 at the end of the day. I am not trying to make you think badly of SEVL, I am just asking questions. People keep saying I am nay-saying or "bashing" SEVL, but, once again, all I did was post the fundamentals. This should tell you something. I backed up my opinions with facts, now I want someone else to take the opposite view and convince me to cover my short. I think anyone who was short SEVL before today was forced to cover (thus pushing the stock price up even further). As of yesterday 331,189 shares were short... that's a short ratio of 3!!! All of those had to cover or bite the big one. I will not be scared shitless if it gaps up tomorrow at open. It has to go to above 50 before it earases my gains form today. I think I would be able to cover before it got there. ;)