Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : THQ,Inc. (THQI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff W. who wrote (4775)	4/21/1998 10:50:00 PM
From: StaggerLee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14266

>>This is absurd. Your statement assumes that the company would not have had any additional product to fill the gap left by WCW over the last year.<< They didn't have one in Q1 1997 when they only did $12 million. Or in 1996 when they only did $7. Great selling games don't grow on trees. I'll grant you they would have done more than $6 million without WCW, but it would likely be a lot closer to $6 million than to $48. To treat $48 million as an ongoing revenue stream is just burying your head in the sand and denying reality. It's gone, it's in the bank, forget about it. P.S. Any portfolio that's short the internet sector has shown losses YTD, you clown. Every holding in the SL10 had >100% volatility in 1997, I think, so let's not get too excited about every 10% move. If you're that interested in my current holdings, check out the threads I've started on SI this month, including IMKE and KLB, both up over 100%, and then show me where YOUR picks were posted. For a nonimal fee of $426/year, you can subscribe to my newsletter.