SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : NAXOF, Tell me all THE SAINT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mark silvers who wrote (90)4/22/1998 9:09:00 PM
From: W.F. Schwertley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 130
 
Mr Silvers,

One of us doesn't know what he is talking about, of that, we can both be assured. Here's my side.

According to the SEC, an inside trader commits a crime if the information results in either (1) illegal gains or (2) losses avoided. It doesn't say anything, NADA, about loosing money on inside information. By definition, an inside trade must include the above two characteristics... or it's NOT considered an inside trade.

Now I realize this may be too simplistic for many to comprehend so I have addressed your concerns to the SEC and NASD. Upon receipt of their response I will post their words verbatim right here on The Saint thread.

Now, if you are wrong I expect you to leave The Saint alone forever. If you are right, then The Saint must quit posting inside information/rumors on this thread for the next 20 years ;-)

And while we are waiting for the official word, why don't you spend your time in a more suitable manner by going after the real insiders who propelled the stock up today on no, NADA, news.

I'm right behind you Saint (about 50 feet),
WFS

PS. You have always seemed to me to be polite and gracious for the most part. Implying stupidity or ignorance, such as, "W.F. You dont know what you are talking about", has lowered my opinion of you a few notches. IMO, a better response would have been, "W.F. I believe you are mistaken...".