Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Reynolds who wrote (1638)	4/22/1998 9:18:00 AM
From: Manjacake	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5206

It would actually be good if Miles and Buddy stayed away for a while. I agree with Traci's thread that Shore Gold has nothing to do with KRT other than they share a geographical play. Shore gold has moved solely on hype as they have done a much better job at promoting then KRT has. As to value under the ground, Shore Gold's is as useless as KRT's. The supposedly inefficient market theory which was brought up on this thread a few days ago has valued KRT(and will eventually revalue Shore Gold) just fine. I believe the KRT dog will pop in the next while, but solely on hype, as Shore Gold has. To Miles and Buddy: I hope that you guys stay away for quite a while. What KRT needs is good promotion and hype. Have you noticed a pattern? In recent days, the price and volume of KRT seems to strentghten. Then, everytime Buddy starts babbling as he answers everybody's posts with useless dribble, and Miles runs to his keyboard as soon as he "hears" something, the price drops again. Therefore, the "hype" you two goofs are typing here, is really quite useless. I have recently bought into KRT again, as I believe it is about to move. I do not know anything special, I have not "heard" anything, and with this comment, I do not encourage anyone to make decisions in any particular direction. And, no Miles, before you get all p.o'd at me again, and think you are Einstein, I have not been bashing you because of alterior motives or because I was thinking of buying KRT. My posts have been strictly opinions directed at a couple of guys who bought KRT at $4+, and again, in my opinion, are idiots because they are still hanging on, and are trying to convince others that KRT is actually a quality long term hold. Please stay away. Thank You

To: Scott Reynolds who wrote (1638)	4/22/1998 10:11:00 AM
From: BUDDY MOYNIHAN	Respond to of 5206

hello scott and all: michael - 1621 - looks like cameco can get into the driver's seat in the falc play now by buying uranerz (and ponying up there one third).... i wonder what will happen with the operator status. i hope krt gets it. uranerz has done a great job drilling falc but rotten in a few other areas..... - kidman - 1622 - no, cameco will now have 10% (the carrying interest) unless they pay for their share of the 1998 drilling program. then they will have 40%.... this does raise some interesting points as the transfer of jv interests in this p'ship has always been a volatile issue.... yes, we will need a new operator unless the uranerz people stick around... - peter - 1625 - that's our job peter.... better fleck than us.... - terence - 1629 - congrats.... - lilian - compare krt vs sgf, 'eh? i hope both companies can work together (krt did not pursue a jv with sgf even after i begged them to.... - there is no way to say whether or not sgf would have been interested either...). it can only help both of them. clearly the news is good for sgf while the news for krt is also encouraging..... sgf would have benefitted the most had krt's samples not been only "20% complete".... - scott - 1638 - i can't believe zoli's bullish either!!! one thing though zoli, can you get that crystal ball to say $1.30 instead of 75 cents??? soon.... can't wait for the pp closing and the agm set.... - buddy