SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Adrian Wu who wrote (32080)4/22/1998 12:09:00 PM
From: Maxwell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583304
 
Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are just a little over 1 month away from the launch of the K6-3D. This event is more important than the K6 launch last year. The K6 launch was the day that AMD caught up with Intel. The K6-3D launch will be the day that AMD will diverge and be different from Intel. Motherboards socket 7 with 100MHz will also be available everywhere. Consumers will be blessed.

Maxwell



To: Adrian Wu who wrote (32080)4/22/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583304
 
Adrian, please ignore this provocateur John Y.Wang.

However, the question is not so simple. Since
Intel has likely dropped any Socket7 support
with introduction of the Celetron, the real
question is whether VIA, ALi and SiS are ready
to supply enough 100MHz chipsets to maintain the
Socket7 at 20-30M sets per year.

The Socket7 boards are obviously cheaper to make:
Slot1 needs a huge 2M EPROM to hold some "microcode
patches" to work around numerous Pentium-II bugs
in contrast to 1M EPROM BIOS for S7 boards; Slot1
also needs an additional secondary power source
to provide the 1.5V reference for GTL+ signals.
The Intel South bridge is also underdeveloped:
the PS/2 mouse port, keyboard, floppy, etc,
require typically 4 more chips to solder. In ALi
chipset, all this is handled by a single chip.

The caveat here might be that Intel may give
his BX for about free. Having $11B in cash,
they can afford this for a while. Intel's policy
for subsidizing his low-end products and bribing
OEMs is the problem.

Regards,

Ali



To: Adrian Wu who wrote (32080)4/22/1998 11:44:00 PM
From: Time Traveler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583304
 
Please name a few of the 30 companies supporting this phantom Super Socket-7, with links please.

With only 15% of the market for this Super Socket-7 (very, very optimistic here since this interface is still not available), how can you say the cost is lower than Slot-I which is here already and going to be 80+% of the market.

Do you know that the higher the quantity of manufacturing, the lower the cost? The folks that manufacture super Socket-7 would be forced to drop out in supporting of Slot-I motherboards.

Enough talk. Let me give you a quiz.

True or false, the higher the quantity, the lower is the cost.

Time Traveler